What To Do When a Miracle Drug Is Found to be The Cause of a Host of Unexpected Maladies?
There's an epidemic of immune disorders in America. Allergies (especially food allergies), asthma, atopy, hypersensitivity disorders including Stevens Johnson Syndrome, Crohn's disease, type1 diabetes, obesity and more are being laid at the feet of perinatal use of antibiotics. Evidence is mounting rapidly that the use of antibiotics in newborns or their mothers disrupts the intestinal microbiota essential to a well-functioning immune system. The consequences are seen in the host of immune-related disorders which have become perhaps the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States today. For a new primer try: Perinatal Programming of Asthma: The Role of Gut Microbiota.
So what should we make of a drug that when first administered saved a young woman, allowing her to have a family and to live to 90* and yet which (because the role that gut bacteria play in generating a healthy immune system was decades away from being known) would eventually precipitate a wave of autoimmune disease in the United States? If antibiotics are indeed responsible for as many cases of debilitating illness as is now widely suspected, should we ban them and vilify their makers? Should their makers be driven to ruin by our tort system to ensure that nothing like penicillin is ever unleashed on the public again? Or should we instead finally recognize that we must take the good with the bad; that with every advance comes risk; and, that unintended consequences, the nature and extent of which may not be known for years to come, is the price of progress?